ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Voices from the ICU: a qualitative study of healthcare providers' decision-making experiences during the provision of life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units of public and private referral hospitals in Uganda.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe overall goal of intensive care treatment is to ensure patients return to an acceptable functional state, and, the decision-making in administering life-sustaining treatment (LST) is a key determinant of patients' survival in intensive care units (ICUs). We explored the decision-making experiences and practices of healthcare providers (HCPs) regarding their use of LST in ICUs in Uganda. METHODOLOGY: This was a phenomenological study, conducted in ICUs of a public and private hospital in Uganda's capital Kampala. Twenty in-depth interviews were conducted with purposively selected clinicians involved in making decisions regarding providing LST in both hospitals. Data were thematically analysed using NVivo software, series 1.0.
resultsWe found that, clinicians' decision-making for administering LST followed a thorough assessment of the patient's condition and engaged the patient's family in the process. However, some dilemmas arose when the intensivists and the patient's family disagreed on treatment decisions and in dealing with advanced directives. There were no standard guidelines followed while deciding on LST in the ICUs. The decisions to withdraw or withhold LST were influenced by; financial capacity of the patient's family, resource capacity of the hospital, the status of clinical examination, the patient's age characteristic. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Whereas some clinicians' practices were based on internationally recommended clinical ethical conduct such as engaging the patient's family in decision-making, the lack of national and/or institutional standard processes that guide decision-making remains a challenge. Establishing structured and functional clinical ethics committees, treatment guidelines or protocols could guide decision-making and improve the survival of patients in these ICUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.