Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41350694›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2025

Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting acute kidney injury after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective multicenter study.

Jiaxin Li, Longhe Xu, Yingqun Yu, Xiufeng Li, Yi Liu, Weiwei Liu, Jin Yan, Han Gao, Fei Liu, Changhong Sun and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jiaxin Li *Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Longhe Xu *Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yingqun Yu *Department of Anesthesiology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiufeng LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Weiwei LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jin YanMedical Team of Lhasa Detachment, Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Lhasa, China.
Han GaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fei LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Changhong SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huixian ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yunfei LvDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiang HuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yongzhe LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. lyzgao2025@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is an established, minimally invasive technique to treat patients with renal masses. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) after RAPN is high and is associated with poor prognosis. This study aims to develop and validate an interpretable machine-learning model based on clinical features for individualized risk assessment of RAPN-AKI.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 325 patients undergoing RAPN at the Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (May 2022-Oct 2023) as the training dataset, and 146 from the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Nov 2023-Dec 2024) for external validation. Models were constructed using Boruta-selected features and eight machine learning algorithms. Performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1-score, accuracy, precision, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) interpreted feature contributions.

resultsThe incidence of AKI in internal training and external validation datasets was 24.6% and 26%, respectively. The Boruta algorithm identified duration of renal artery blockade, preoperative serum creatinine (Scr), gender, body mass index (BMI), and age as important features. Among the eight machine learning models, the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model demonstrated the best and most stable predictive outcomes in the internal training dataset (AUC = 0.889) and external validation dataset (AUC = 0.779). Both the calibration curve and DCA indicated better calibration and greater net benefit. SHAP analysis revealed the contribution of important features in the following order: duration of renal artery blockade, Scr, BMI, age, and gender. Dependency plots showed that duration of renal artery blockade > 22 min, Scr > 80 µmol/L, BMI > 25 kg/m², age > 60 years, and male were significantly associated with an increased risk of AKI.

conclusionThe GBM model exhibited strong predictive performance in both internal training dataset and external validation dataset and has the potential to assist clinicians to identify the high-risk patients early, enabling timely interventions that may reduce the incidence of RAPN-AKI and improving clinical outcomes. While, the interpretable machine learning model is currently applicable only to patients with low-risk or normal preoperative renal function.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryMachine LearningNephrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAcute kidney injuryAdverse outcomeMachine learningPrediction modelSHAP

Identifiers

PMID41350694
PMCPMC12797439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.