ArticleScientific reports2025
Immunoreactivity and distribution of Fos in the mouse brain following diverse general anesthetics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
General anesthesia induces a range of effects, including unconsciousness, analgesia, amnesia, and immobility. Despite its widespread use for over a century, the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. This study aims to investigate whether different intravenous anesthetics share common neuronal targets. Propofol (180 mg/kg), midazolam (75 mg/kg), and esketamine (250 mg/kg) were intraperitoneally injected in C57BL/6J mice, respectively. After one hour of anesthesia, mice were transcardially perfused, and their brains were examined for Fos protein localization to assess changes in neuronal activity across the central nervous system. The 14 selected regions of interest (ROIs) associated with sleep-wake regulation, emotional stress processing, or pain modulation include: oval division of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (ovBNST), basal forebrain (BF), ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO), paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (PvH), supraoptic nucleus (SON), central amygdaloid nucleus (CeA), paraventricular thalamic nucleus (PVT), lateral habenular nucleus (LHb), tuberomammillary nucleus (TMN), Edinger-Westphal nucleus (EW), dorsal raphe nucleus (DR), ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG), locus coeruleus (LC) and parabrachial nucleus (PB). Following the administration of three different anesthetics, the immunoreactivity of Fos in the 14 ROIs increased in the following brain regions: ovBNST, LHb, PvH, SON, CeA, and EW; however, the BF, PVT, DR, LC, and PB showed no appreciable changes, while the VLPO, TMN, and vlPAG exhibited variable Fos immunoreactivity across the three anesthetic groups. These findings suggest that propofol, midazolam, and esketamine may commonly enhance neuronal activity in specific brain regions, providing new morphological insights into the mechanisms of general anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.