ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-label mental health classification in social media posts with multi-perspective prompt ensemble and auxiliary self-supervision.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety and depression have become major global health concerns. With the rapid rise of social media, people increasingly share emotions and personal struggles through posts, which often convey multiple mental states simultaneously. To address this multi-label classification challenge in mental health texts, this study proposes a multi-task framework with two main modules, a multi-perspective prompt design module and a perturbation-based self-supervised learning module, based on a pre-trained language model backbone. Prompts from sociological, psychological, and educational perspectives are used to enhance semantic understanding. To improve model robustness, we formulate self-supervised auxiliary tasks where the model predicts whether a sentence has undergone insertion, swap, or deletion. Experiments on the MultiWD dataset, covering six wellness dimensions, show that our method outperforms all baselines. Furthermore, ablation studies explore the impact of different training configurations and confirm the critical contributions of both proposed modules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.