ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating active brain-computer interfaces (aBCIs) with passive BCIs (pBCIs) under different frustration levels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mental state of the users can significantly affect the performance of active brain-computer interfaces (aBCIs). In this work, we aim to adopt passive BCIs (pBCIs) to measure a typical mental state, frustration, which is much relevant to aBCIs. A novel paradigm has been developed that combines both aBCIs and pBCIs under different frustration levels of users. The aBCI in this work is based on classic binary motor imagery (MI). In experiments, a new strategy was implemented that uses visual feedback to induce different levels of frustration. The electroencephalography (EEG) data collected were used for both aBCIs and pBCIs. The pBCI was utilized to assess the frustration level during the aBCI tasks, and the aBCI classification models for different levels of frustration were trained. For pBCI, the filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP) feature extraction and support vector machine (SVM) classification were utilized to classify three (i.e., low, moderate, high) frustration levels. For aBCI, the same method (FBCSP+SVM) was used to classify left versus right MI. We also aim to improve the performance of aBCIs in such conditions, so we developed two new methods to incorporate the pBCI results to adapt three MI classifiers to the varying states of frustration. Compared to the conventional approach of directly classifying MI tasks without considering frustration, the two proposed methods increased the mean classification accuracy by 7.40% and 8.62%, respectively. (Compared with the commonly used non-emotional discrimination data, the results are improved by 4.56% and 5.87% respectively.) Within the scope of non-invasive EEG and MI-based aBCI, this study provides, to our knowledge, an initial integrated demonstration in which a frustration-level classifier (pBCI) is trained and then used to adapt MI decoding (aBCI). It should not be taken as a claim of originality beyond this context. Starting from "user subjective perception", this paper rises to the engineering level of "objective frustration recognition and classification model adaptation", and makes a contribution to the depth of EEG data analysis and methodological integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.