ArticleScientific reports2025
High-frequency ultrasound for microcirculation in metastatic mouse lymph node: contrast-free versus contrast-enhanced imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Focal defects are one of the important features for the diagnosis of lymph node (LN) metastasis. In our previous study, an accurate method for detecting contrast agents was proposed. However, conventional B-mode and contrast-enhanced images via ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) have the limitations of contrast and spatial resolution to visualize the microcirculation, such as focal defects to distinguish between benign and malignant LN. In the present study, we have developed a novel method based on clutter filtering with singular value decomposition (SVD) analysis using time-integrated amplitude envelope (TIAE) in high-frequency 40 MHz ultrasound for high contrast resolution of the microcirculation in LN tissue. A mouse LN was visualized in vivo without and with UCA to compare the contrast enhancement. A metastatic LN model was established with LM8-luc cells of C3H/HeJ-lpr/lpr and MXH54/Mo-lpr/lpr mice. Bioluminescence imaging and pathological observations were also conducted to evaluate tumor growth. It was found that clutter-filtered contrast-enhanced images with UCA could visualize the feature of the microcirculation in the control LN and focal defects in the metastatic LN. Consistent with histological findings of disrupted architecture and cellular heterogeneity, whereas clutter-filtered B-mode images without UCA failed to visualize the vascular circulation. TIAE provided images with high noise resistance, and the calculated vascular area in the LN showed a decreasing trend in the metastatic group compared to the control group. Our framework enables robust visualization and quantification of LN heterogeneity in microcirculation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.