Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41350516›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025

Does It Hurt More To Be Called "Gay" or "Pizza Face"?: Gender Differences in Teasing Content and Associated Harm.

Ximena Paredes Robredo, Naomi C Z Andrews, Molly Dawes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ximena Paredes RobredoDepartment of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Naomi C Z AndrewsDepartment of Child and Youth Studies, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada. nandrews@brocku.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9390-314X
Molly DawesCollege of Education, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6029-0420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender differences in the content and impact (e.g., perceived harm) of peer teasing are documented but not well understood. Males tend to tease on a broader range of topics, but females anticipate more negative impacts from teasing. Yet, little research has investigated the complex associations between gender, content, and the impact of teasing. Our study explored these associations via qualitative interviews, asking postsecondary participants (N = 27; 63% female) to retrospectively recount teasing experiences (Grades K-12). Using thematic analysis, we found that males were predominantly teased about their physical appearance, identity, and ability, whereas females were teased about physical appearance, personality, and their relationship interests. Men found teasing about their identity particularly harmful. In contrast, women more frequently identified appearance-based teasing as more harmful. Practical implications include offering educators' insights into which teasing topics may elicit more negative responses from adolescents and emerging adults, as well as how the impact of teasing may vary by gender. In the broader social context, understanding associations between gender, content, and the impact of teasing can help inform a gender-sensitive intervention framework, ultimately reducing negative impacts associated with peer teasing.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPeer GroupAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSex FactorsYoung AdultAppearance-based teasingGenderIdentity-based teasingTeasing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.