ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
A Design of Experiments and Risk Management-Driven Analytical Platform for Charge Variant Analysis of Therapeutic Antibodies by Imaged Capillary Isoelectric Focusing.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polyclonal Antibody Therapeutics: Analytical Innovations and Regulatory Perspectives for Addressing Heterogeneity Challenges.Analytical chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) charge variants during their entire life cycle is crucial, as their profiles represent a critical quality attribute of biotherapeutics. While the current scenario still shows marked analytical non-uniformity in the evaluation of charge variants with imaged capillary isoelectric focusing (icIEF) with many "product-specific" methods, regulatory authorities are increasingly encouraging the utilization of horizontal standards, such as Platform Analytical Procedures (PAPs). A practical Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) workflow is provided, emphasizing the Design of Experiments as a Quality Risk Management tool to develop a PAP based on icIEF, able to accurately measure charge variants pI values. Infliximab was chosen as the leading molecule. The cause-effect matrix, combined with an asymmetric screening design, identified key parameters exerting a critical impact on the Analytical Procedure Attributes. PAP quality measurements were ensured by a 10% risk acceptance level, employing response surface methodology and Monte Carlo simulation. The developed PAP was validated using three independent System Suitability samples and exhibited a low bias in the pI measurement (less than 2%), while maintaining satisfactory separation performance. Good intra-day and inter-day repeatability, combined with a robustness test and an exploratory application to real samples of three different therapeutic mAbs, confirmed its versatility. The study supports regulatory trends by demonstrating the successful application of AQbD in PAP development. This icIEF platform would ensure a systematically consistent analysis of charge variants, where pI is promoted to an objective tool, to be used as an additional reliable parameter in the Quality Control context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41350510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.