ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
Anatomical landmarks and angulation of the subclavian vessels: a CT-based morphometric study of the clavicular safety corridor.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aims to describe the morphometric relationship of the subclavian vein and artery to the clavicle and their angular orientation, with a particular focus on improving the safety of interventional procedures by bringing new anatomical landmarks. The costoclavicular region is a critical anatomical corridor where the subclavian vein, subclavian artery, and brachial plexus cords pass beneath the clavicle, partially protected by the subclavius muscle. Precise knowledge of clavicle-vessel relationships is essential, as previous studies have reported considerable variability in the measured distances between the clavicle and adjacent vascular structures, particularly in the context of trauma or surgical fixation. This study aimed to define morphometric parameters to establish a safer anatomical corridor for clinical interventions. A cross-sectional study was conducted using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans of adult patients (≥ 18 years). Each clavicle was divided into 13 reference points. At each point, we measured clavicular thickness, the distance from the inferior border of the clavicle to the anterior surface of the subclavian vein and artery, vessel diameters, and the angular relationship between the clavicle and vessels. Side- and sex -related differences were analyzed. A total of 150 participants (75 men, 75 women) were included. All participants were of Hispanic ethnicity, representative of the northeastern Mexican population. The greatest clavicular thickness was observed in men on the right side (14.4 ± 1.6 mm), whereas the shortest distance to the subclavian vein occurred in women on the right side (5.9 ± 2.1 mm). The subclavian vein was significantly larger in men on the right side (14.8 ± 2.7 mm). Significant sex- and side-dependent variations were identified in clavicle dimensions, vessel diameters, and vessel-clavicle distances and angulations. The point of closest proximity between the clavicle and the subclavian vein was consistently located at reference point 3/13 which corresponds to the medial third of the clavicle, located approximately at the costoclavicular region. At this site, the vein was reached at an average depth of ~ 13 mm when the needle was directed 20° cranially relative to the inferior clavicular border. These parameters define a practical "safety cone" that may improve the success and safety of subclavian vein catheterization, particularly in settings where ultrasound guidance is unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41350497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.