ArticleScientific reports2025
Translation and psychometric validation of the Taiwanese daily stress inventory in a young university sample.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate assessment of daily stressors is crucial for understanding stress-health dynamics, yet culturally adapted instruments are needed for diverse populations. This study translated and psychometrically evaluated the Taiwanese Daily Stress Inventory (TDSI), a Traditional Chinese adaptation of the Daily Stress Inventory (DSI). Data were collected from 470 Traditional Chinese-speaking young adults, predominantly female (86% female, 14% male), with an average age of 19.82 (SD = 2.50). The TDSI demonstrated excellent internal consistency for its core indices (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω > 0.80). Construct validity was supported by significant negative correlations between TDSI indices (Frequency, Sum, Average Impact Rating) and self-reported physical and mental health, confirming that higher daily stress corresponds with poorer health. Analyses of meditation experience were treated as exploratory, given the small proportion of regular practitioners. The findings support the TDSI as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing daily stress in Traditional Chinese-speaking young adults, contributing a needed tool for cross-cultural psychological assessment research and practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.