ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing patient participation in emergency department through patient-friendly clinical notes generated by large language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of GPT-4-Generated Discharge Letters on Patients' Medical Comprehension: Prospective Crossover Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- From Innovation to Impact: The CREATE Framework as a Blueprint for Large Language Model Adoption in Opioid Treatment Programs.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-centered care (PCC) emphasizes providing patients with clear information to support active participation in medical decision-making. However, the fast-paced nature of emergency departments (ED), coupled with communication barriers and varying health literacy, limits effective patient engagement. While large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in generating patient-friendly documents, their use in ED settings remains underexplored. This study aimed to develop LLM-generated patient-friendly clinical notes (PFCNs) that transform clinical notes into plain language, and to evaluate whether PFCNs could enhance patient participation in ED consultations. In this study, a total of 120 PFCNs were generated and evaluated, receiving high understandability ratings from both 10 clinicians and 20 patients (PEMAT score: 87.2%). Patients who used PFCNs during simulated ED consultations reported significantly higher participation levels compared to prior ED experiences (PPQ, P < 0.05). Qualitative data showed that PFCNs supported understanding, question preparation, emotional reassurance and improved relationships with clinicians, though concerns about hallucinations and integration into clinical workflows remained. These findings suggested that PFCNs generated by LLMs show promise for enhancing patient participation in ED consultations. Future work should address accuracy and explore real-world integration to support safe and effective deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.