ArticleScientific reports2025
Interoception in migraine is characterised by normal accuracy but altered sensibility and behaviour.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acoustic voice analysis of women with migraine.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Prefrontal dysregulation of interoceptive and emotional processing in episodic migraine: a task-based fMRI study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Migraine is typically precipitated by unaccustomed changes in one's internal state and/or external environment. Migraine symptoms largely involve increased, noxious, awareness of bodily changes and external stimuli. Links have been proposed between migraine and interoception (sensing and interpreting internal states), but direct evidence is limited. Unmedicated, otherwise healthy, age-matched female participants were grouped by migraine tendency: control (no unprovoked headaches, n = 19); low-frequency ( < = 3 migraines/month, n = 20); high-frequency ( > = 4 migraines/month, n = 19). Interoception was assessed, interictally, with standardised questionnaires such as MAIA-2 and a widely used heartbeat counting task. The notable significant questionnaire-based difference was in the 'noticing', 'not distracting' domain of the MAIA-2; controls were least likely to continue activities despite experiencing physical discomfort, and high-frequency migraineurs most likely. Follow-up questioning clarified that this behaviour related predominantly to migraine-related symptoms. The heartbeat task found no differences in accuracy. Interoceptive accuracy scores were not reduced in migraine participants. Self-reported tendency to deliberately ignore physical discomfort, is associated with migraine frequency. Confidence (sensibility) showed a significant main effect of group. The low-frequency migraine group had the lowest confidence but interpretation of this finding requires further attention which could form a longitudinal study over the migraine cycle to distinguish causes from effects of migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.