ArticleScientific reports2025
Adaptive dynamic hypergraph learning for ingredient aware food recommendation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning fuzzy representations for hypergraph node classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food recommendation systems face fundamental challenges in modeling the complex, compositional relationships among users, foods, and ingredients. Traditional collaborative filtering and Graph Neural Networks rely on pairwise connections that oversimplify culinary interactions, while existing hypergraph approaches use static weights that fail to adapt to dynamic user preferences and ingredient semantics. We propose FRMADHG (Food Recommendation with Multi-objective Adaptive Dynamic Hypergraph), a novel framework that captures higher-order interactions through a tripartite hypergraph where foods serve as hyperedges connecting users and ingredients. Our key innovations include: (1) a complexity-aware adaptive attention mechanism that dynamically switches between efficient cosine similarity and sophisticated learnable attention based on local interaction complexity, (2) type-specific embedding propagation rules that respect the distinct semantic roles of users, foods, and ingredients, (3) dynamic Laplacian construction that evolves during training to emphasize semantically coherent relationships, and (4) a multi-objective learning strategy combining triplet ranking, contrastive learning, and regularization for robust embeddings. FRMADHG provides multi-granular explainability through ingredient-level importance scores and path-based reasoning, enabling transparent dietary decisions. Comprehensive experiments on two large-scale datasets-Food.com (32,000 users, 18,500 foods, 1,270 unique ingredients) and Allrecipes (25,400 users, 16,200 foods, 1,050 ingredients)-demonstrate significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods: 19.8% relative gain in Precision@10 compared to collaborative filtering baselines, 12.4% improvement over recent hypergraph approaches, and 18.7% enhancement in Recall@10 (all with [Formula: see text]). Ablation studies validate the critical contributions of dynamic hypergraph construction (12.4% performance gain), adaptive attention mechanism (11.8%), and contrastive learning (9.7%), while user studies confirm the effectiveness of our ingredient-level explanations for building user trust and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.