ArticleScientific reports2025
Biodata-centric cardiovascular disease prediction using multi-objective genetic algorithm-driven deep ensembles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing availability of patient BioData, including clinical measurements and physiological indicators, offers unprecedented opportunities for developing intelligent, data-driven diagnostic tools. In the context of cardiovascular disease (CVD)—the leading cause of mortality globally—mining such BioData effectively is critical for enabling early detection and supporting complex clinical decision-making. However, traditional predictive models often fail with inherent trade-offs, such as balancing predictive accuracy across imbalanced classes, minimizing feature redundancy, and ensuring model interpretability. To address these limitations, this study introduces a two-stage prediction framework for heart disease. First, a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) is employed to perform optimal feature selection by simultaneously maximizing classification accuracy and minimizing redundancy among the 13 clinical features of the UCI Cleveland Heart Disease dataset. Second, the selected features are used to train a deep ensemble of regularized Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs). The ensemble outputs are aggregated using uniform weighting and further refined through AdaBoost-based fusion to enhance robustness. This integrated approach ensures that the model captures clinically meaningful patterns across diverse patient profiles, while also improving interpretability for medical practitioners. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves 96% accuracy, 97% sensitivity, and an AUC-ROC of 0.978, outperforming several baseline machine learning models. The findings confirm the potential of the proposed MOGA–MLP ensemble framework for real-world clinical deployment, offering a reliable, interpretable, and generalizable solution for cardiovascular risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.