Trial reportScientific reports2025
Growth and sleep outcomes after adenotonsillectomy in pediatric mild sleep-disordered breathing.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02562040 (Impact of Treatment of Mild Sleep-Disordered Breathing on Children's Health), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Treatment of Mild Sleep-Disordered Breathing on Children's Health
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adenotonsillectomy has been shown to promote "catch-up growth" in children with obstructive sleep apnea. However, its impact on children with mild sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) (i.e., habitual snoring but not frequent obstructive breathing events) remains unclear. This secondary analysis utilized data from the Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Trial for Snoring (PATS), a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded interventional study. PATS enrolled 459 children aged 3-12 years with mild SDB, all of whom had an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI) no greater than 3. These children were randomized to either adenotonsillectomy or watchful waiting and were followed for 12 months. Growth outcomes included height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) expressed in sex- and age-specific percentiles. Sleep parameters were measured using polysomnography. We used multivariable linear regression to assess the statistical significance of differences in these outcomes at 12 months after adenotonsillectomy or randomization between the surgery and watchful waiting groups. Among the 330 children who consented to share data (median age 6.4 years), 231 had an OAHI below 1. After multivariable adjustment, the adenotonsillectomy group had significantly higher increase in height (mean difference: 2.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33 to 5.15) and weight (mean difference: 2.79, 95% CI 0.29 to 5.28) percentiles at 12-month follow-up, compared with the watchful waiting group. Significant differences were also observed for sleep parameters, including OAHI (mean difference: -1.36, 95% CI -2.07 to -0.65), respiratory disturbance index (mean difference: -0.47, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.20), and oxygen desaturation index (mean difference: -0.99, 95% CI -1.85 to -0.13). The adenotonsillectomy group further demonstrated better sleep architecture, including decreased Stage 1 sleep (mean difference: -1.00, 95% CI -1.90 to -0.11) and increased Stage 2 sleep (mean difference: 2.06, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.59). Subgroup analysis indicated greater benefit of adenotonsillectomy for children at 3-5 years, boys, children with grade III or IV tonsillar hypertrophy, and non-asthmatic children. In conclusion, adenotonsillectomy improved not only sleep-related outcomes but also growth in children with mild SDB, suggesting that surgical intervention may provide additional health benefits beyond symptom relief, particularly in younger children with tonsillar hypertrophy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02562040, registered on September 25, 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.