Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41350324›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluating and optimizing ecological networks in the Hubei Yangtze river economic belt using an importance-sensitivity and circuit-graph approach.

Junfeng Zeng, Shushen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junfeng ZengCollege of Horticulture and Gardening, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China. zjf@yangtzeu.edu.cn.
Shushen LiCollege of Horticulture and Gardening, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on the Yangtze River Economic Belt in Hubei Province, addressing ecosystem service degradation and ecological risks under rapid urbanization. An integrated "Importance-Sensitivity-Circuit Theory-Graph Theory" framework was developed to optimize the regional ecological network. Ecological sources were identified by combining ecosystem service importance and ecological sensitivity. Circuit theory was applied to simulate multi-path corridors and key nodes, while graph theory quantitatively evaluated network connectivity. Results indicate that ecological sources show a spatial pattern of "high in the east and west, low in the middle," with the Jianghan Plain identified as a key corridor break zone; Circuit theory revealed multiple potential corridors, high-priority pinch points, and barriers needing restoration; Graph analysis confirmed that the optimized network achieved significant improvements in closure, connection efficiency, and overall connectivity. By coupling ecological functional attributes with structural network optimization, this framework overcomes the limitations of traditional approaches that focus primarily on landscape morphology or single indicators, and its systematic and quantitative evaluation pathway provides a transferable methodological reference for constructing ecological networks in complex regions. The findings offer scientific support for regional ecological security pattern development and territorial spatial planning.

Indexed as

Circuit theoryEcological networkEcological sensitivityEcosystem service importanceThe hubei section of the yangtze river economic belt

Identifiers

PMID41350324
PMCPMC12680631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.