ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-optimized compact dual-band medical syringe-inspired wearable antenna for efficient WBAN applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design optimization of wearable antennas using an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Design and development of a graphene-based MIMO antenna for smart multi-band sub-6 GHz 5G wearable communication applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a compact, machine learning (ML)-enhanced dual-band antenna designed specifically for wearable applications within Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs). Wearable antennas in WBAN applications face challenges such as human body-induced electromagnetic interference, limited bandwidth, and SAR compliance, which hinder the effective performance of conventional designs. This work addresses these issues by employing machine learning (ML) to optimize the antenna design, thereby ensuring enhanced performance and adaptability in dynamic, on-body environments. The antenna is fabricated on a flexible 30 × 48.8 mm² Rogers Duroid 3003™ substrate, and operates efficiently at 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz, achieving fractional bandwidths of 9.7% and 7.8%, peak gains of 4.0 dBi and 6.2 dBi, and high radiation efficiencies of 91% and 93%, respectively. The radiation profile shows a bidirectional pattern along the E-plane, while the H-plane maintains nearly uniform radiation in all directions at both frequency bands. Compliance with safety regulations was confirmed through Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) analysis, with values of 1.17 W/kg (1 g) and 0.851 W/kg (10 g) at 2.4 GHz, and 0.813 W/kg (1 g) and 0.267 W/kg (10 g) at 5.8 GHz, all well below the regulatory thresholds set by FCC and ICNIRP. Mechanical flexibility and robustness were validated through testing under bent conditions on various body regions including the chest, arm, and lap, reflecting reliable operation in realistic WBAN use cases. Additionally, antenna resonant frequency was predicted using a supervised ML regression approach. Among the evaluated algorithms, the random forest model provided the best performance with an R² value of 87.70% and low error metrics (MAE: 0.35, MSE: 0.89, MSLE: 0.21, RMSLE: 0.35, RMSE: 0.94). These results confirm the antenna's reliability, safety, and adaptability for body-worn wireless systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.