ArticleNature communications2025
Early prediction of lithium-ion battery degradation with a generative pre-trained transformer.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early detection of degradation in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is crucial for effective predictive maintenance and recycling. However, accurately predicting the future degradation of LIBs in early stage is challenging due to the barely noticeable performance changes at initial charging cycles and the long-term nonlinear degradation pattern. In this work, we propose a two-stage early-stage degradation prediction method, BatteryGPT, which employs a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) to autoregressively predict the charging data of entire lifecycle and a state-of-health (SOH) estimator to correlates the predicted charging data with ageing features in LIBs. The validation demonstrates that BatteryGPT can predict the future LIB degradation with high accuracy using early charging data, before any capacity degradation is evident. Predicting with the first 30% of the battery lifetime, BatteryGPT significantly outperforms baselines, achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.213% for SOH variation prediction, and mean absolute percent errors (MAPE) of 2.30% and 1.18% for knee point and EOL predictions. Even predicting with the first 5% of lifetime charging data, BatteryGPT demonstrates strong early-stage prediction performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.