ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Leveraging Hybrid Natural Language Processing Techniques for Large-Scale Pulmonary Embolism Identification.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AquaAI: development and internal validation of a Danish transformer-based model to identify drowning and aquatic incidents in prehospital medical records.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Calming the Storm: Natural Language Processing Applied to Pulmonary Embolism Research.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Behavioral Intelligence in Action: Implementation Science and Cardiovascular Learning Health Systems.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA critical gap persists in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism (PE) despite contemporary medical advances, necessitating large-scale electronic health record analysis through hybrid natural language processing (NLP) methodologies to elucidate its pathophysiology and optimize clinical interventions.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to develop and validate a hybrid NLP pipeline combining machine learning (ML) and rule-based techniques for accurate identification of PE cases from large-scale radiology report data sets.
methodsThe hybrid NLP pipeline consisted of a ML algorithm trained on 1,040 computed tomography pulmonary angiogram reports from Brigham and Women's Hospital, with 80% used for training and 20% for testing. The pipeline was then validated on a larger data set of 49,611 radiology reports from the Mass General Brigham (MGB) health care system. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
resultsThe ML model achieved an accuracy of 91% and area under the curve of 0.90 on the Brigham and Women's Hospital testing data set. When deployed on the larger MGB data set, the model's accuracy decreased to 85%. Iterative application of the rule-based algorithm improved the model's accuracy to 94.8%, sensitivity to 96.4%, specificity to 93.2%, positive predictive value to 93.0%, and negative predictive value to 96.5% on the MGB data set.
conclusionsThe hybrid NLP approach required less training data than pure ML models and demonstrated high performance across diverse health care settings. A hybrid NLP pipeline can efficiently and accurately identify PE cases from radiology reports and could be deployed for broader PE-focused research and clinical surveillance if similarly validated in external data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.