ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Ventricular Apical Pacing for Ventricular Tachycardia Storm in a Patient With Midventricular Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA 74-year-old woman with midventricular obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy complicated by apical aneurysm and sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) was referred to our hospital, where she underwent catheter ablation and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. CASE SUMMARY: She was readmitted 1 year later with VT storm triggering frequent ICD shocks. Antiarrhythmic drugs and repeat ablation were ineffective. We used the ICD to reduce her intraventricular pressure gradient via atrioventricular sequential right ventricular apical pacing. The pressure gradient decreased from 53 to 13 mm Hg, and VT was completely suppressed simultaneously, with no further incidents of ICD therapy for 22 months. DISCUSSION: Stretch-activated channels from mechanical stimuli of intracavitary pressure overload were considered a possible mechanism of the VT storm. Because a substantial proportion of patients with midventricular obstruction (MVO) already meet the criteria for ICD implantation, switching from backup mode to active pacing mode can be a simple therapeutic option in patients with VT. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: In some patients with MVO, apical pacing from an ICD may be antiarrhythmic for ventricular arrhythmias as well as beneficial for hemodynamics. Given that a substantial proportion of patients with MVO already meet primary or secondary criteria for transvenous ICD implantation, a switch from backup to active pacing mode can be a simple therapeutic option in many patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.