Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41349813›Full record

ArticleBrain research2026

Yank-related changes in corticospinal recruitment gain in humans.

Abdulkerim Darendeli, Mathew Yarossi, Spencer Lake Jakobs-Skolik, Nathaniel Pinkes, Vaishnavi Sharma, Erica Kemmerling, Eugene Tunik, Oscar Soto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abdulkerim DarendeliDepartment of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Mathew YarossiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Spencer Lake Jakobs-SkolikDepartment of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Nathaniel PinkesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Vaishnavi SharmaDepartment of Neurology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Erica KemmerlingSchool of Engineering, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Eugene TunikDepartment of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
Oscar SotoDepartment of Neurology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: oscar.soto@tuftsmedicine.org.

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pilot Supplement)UL1TR002544 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2018 to 2022
$50.2M
Failure of Facilitation as a Biomarker in ALSR21NS130936 · NINDS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SOTO, OSCAR, TUNIK, EUGENE · 2023 to 2024
$441k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002544NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS130936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of muscle force is a key component of movement. Force is generated by increasing the number and firing rates of motor units (MU), but limited information is available on the corticospinal (CS) recruitment gain across the spectrum of magnitude and rate of force (yank). To assess the effects of force magnitude and yank on motor outputs, we recorded force (motor evoked twitches, METs) and EMG (motor evoked potentials, MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during nearly isometric hand gripping tasks in 20 healthy subjects. Motor cortex TMS was applied during force ramps at different levels of voluntary force magnitude and yank. Yank robustly facilitated METs, maximally at lowest magnitudes of voluntary force, but this facilitation saturated at forces > 50 % of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). At each level of force magnitude there was a linear relationship between the yank of voluntary force and MET amplitude. The slope of this relationship, representing the CS recruitment gain, decayed exponentially with increasing magnitude of force. Changes in CS recruitment gain associated with force magnitude and yank were better explained by METs than by MEPs. A positive yank resulted in larger estimated maximal MET at 0 % force compared to static contractions. These results suggest that METs capture a robust yank-related increase in CS recruitment gain, which is blunted by limited MU availability at high force magnitude. We showed that the estimation of maximal motor outputs is optimally achieved in tasks in which force production is achieved with high yank.

Indexed as

Motor CortexMuscle, SkeletalPyramidal TractsRecruitment, NeurophysiologicalAdultElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHand StrengthHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMuscle ContractionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultForce generationMotoneuronsMotor cortexTMSYank

Identifiers

PMID41349813
PMCPMC12907694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.