ArticleBrain research2026
Yank-related changes in corticospinal recruitment gain in humans.
Article in Brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The generation of muscle force is a key component of movement. Force is generated by increasing the number and firing rates of motor units (MU), but limited information is available on the corticospinal (CS) recruitment gain across the spectrum of magnitude and rate of force (yank). To assess the effects of force magnitude and yank on motor outputs, we recorded force (motor evoked twitches, METs) and EMG (motor evoked potentials, MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during nearly isometric hand gripping tasks in 20 healthy subjects. Motor cortex TMS was applied during force ramps at different levels of voluntary force magnitude and yank. Yank robustly facilitated METs, maximally at lowest magnitudes of voluntary force, but this facilitation saturated at forces > 50 % of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). At each level of force magnitude there was a linear relationship between the yank of voluntary force and MET amplitude. The slope of this relationship, representing the CS recruitment gain, decayed exponentially with increasing magnitude of force. Changes in CS recruitment gain associated with force magnitude and yank were better explained by METs than by MEPs. A positive yank resulted in larger estimated maximal MET at 0 % force compared to static contractions. These results suggest that METs capture a robust yank-related increase in CS recruitment gain, which is blunted by limited MU availability at high force magnitude. We showed that the estimation of maximal motor outputs is optimally achieved in tasks in which force production is achieved with high yank.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.