ArticleExperimental eye research2026
The effect of age on wound healing in the laser induced choroidal neovascularization model.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Murine models of neovascular AMD revisited: Mechanistic pathways, immune-metabolic crosstalk, and the impact of aging and sex.Experimental eye research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The laser induced model of choroidal neovascularization (LiCNV) is a commonly used in vivo rodent model to study neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), although progression of this model is not well understood. In this study we characterize and compare the longitudinal progression of wound healing of laser induced choroidal neovascular (CNV) lesions in young and old mice. Using 2-month and 12-month-old C57BL/6J mice and ocular computerized tomography (OCT), fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography we performed a longitudinal imaging analysis at 3-, 7-, 14- and 28-days following laser injury. This was compared with immunohistochemical analysis of the lesions at similar timepoints for markers of angiogenesis, fibrosis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and gliosis. OCT analysis determined an increased lesion volume in older mice. In contrast younger mice demonstrated earlier vascularization and fibrosis with no difference in neovascularization or leakage. Reactive gliosis occurs directly above the laser-induced CNV lesion in both ages. The RPE in this model encloses the lesion area by day 14 in both young and old mice. This study concludes that age is an important variable in some but not all aspects of laser-induced CNV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.