ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2026
Birthplace, perinatal loss, and the parity-post-reproductive mortality relationship: Evidence from the Jim Crow-era American South.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early studies of the parity-mortality relationship expected high parity to elevate mortality risk, but studies increasingly find that childless and high-parity women have higher post-reproductive mortality risk than moderate-parity women (U-shaped pattern). We investigate race-related differences in completed parity and parity-mortality associations, including attention to childlessness. We use a non-Hispanic Black and White sample of U.S. women born between 1920 and 1941 drawn from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS, 2003-2007) dataset (N = 6542). Black women born in this period, compared to White women, reached higher parity (5+ children) and were more likely childless due, respectively, to greater exposure to southern Jim Crow-era agricultural arrangements (sharecropping) and poorer health. Identification of women's birthplaces in REGARDS allows us to link county-level measures from U.S. Plantation Censuses to women's records. We use count regressions to model completed parity and shared-frailty proportional hazards regressions to model all-cause mortality. We find Black but not White women's high-parity status associated with contextual exposure to plantation agricultural arrangements, and Black but not White women's childlessness primarily associated with perinatal child loss(es). We also find U-shaped parity-post-reproductive mortality patterns among all women, but especially among high-parity Black women born in plantation-holding counties. In the historical context of our study, women's childbearing careers and subsequent mortality risk reflected complex reproductive health histories (especially among the childless) and fertility control practices, which, in turn, reflected differential exposure to geographic, social, and political-economic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.