ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Effect of frequency on dual target deep brain stimulation.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep brain stimulation reduces the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Dual target deep brain stimulation (DT DBS) may better reduce symptoms and minimize side effects than single target, but the optimal parameters of DT DBS are unknown.
objectiveTo quantify the frequency response of DT DBS on bradykinesia and beta oscillations, and to explore intrahemispheric pulse delay shifts as a means to reduce total energy delivered.
methodsWe applied DT DBS using the Summit RC + S in six participants with PD, varying DBS frequency. We further examined the effects of frequency in a biophysical model.
resultsDT DBS at 50 Hz was effective at reducing bradykinesia, whereas increasing DT DBS frequency up to 125 Hz also led to significantly lower beta power. This frequency effect on beta power was replicated in a biophysical model. The model suggested that 22 Hz DT DBS, with an intrahemispheric delay of 40 ms, can reduce beta power by 87 %.
conclusionThis exploratory study (n = 6) suggests that 125 Hz DT DBS best reduced bradykinesia. However, low frequency DBS with an appropriate intrahemispheric delay could also improve symptom relief. SIGNIFICANCE: Both 125 Hz and tailored low-frequency DT DBS may achieve equivalent symptomatic control of PD symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.