Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2025
Efficacy and Reliability of Mobile Uroflowmetry in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Undergoing Transurethral Resection: Prospective Multicenter Observational Pilot Validation Study.
Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Acoustic Uroflowmetry for Noninvasive Urine Flow Rate Monitoring in Men Using Smartphone Acoustic Pattern Recognition: Protocol for the Development of a System and Mobile App.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- An intelligent wearable device based on electrical impedance tomography for dynamic and accurate monitoring of voiding function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: protocol for a single-centre self-controlled diagnostic consistency study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate assessment of voiding patterns before and after surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms is critical in patient care, but it places heavy burdens on both the patient and the clinic. While methods for telemedicine have been devised, no technology for acoustic assessment of urinary patterns has been prospectively evaluated for clinical use.
objectiveThis study aims to assess the precision of a mobile app-based uroflowmetry and compare it with in-office uroflowmetry measurements for the management of patients undergoing surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
methodsThis study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, observational pilot validation study conducted at 3 tertiary centers. A total of 46 patients with BPH who had not received any previous treatment within 4 weeks of their initial outpatient clinic visit were prospectively enrolled. After diagnosis, participants with BPH conducted subsequent uroflowmetry measurements by using a sound-based mobile app, proudP, for at least 4 days during the pretreatment period, followed by transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Additional measurements were taken at the preoperative visit and 4-day periods after 2, 6, and 12 weeks of treatment initiation, with concurrent in-office measurements. Uroflowmetry parameters, including maximum flow rate (Q
resultsTURP resulted in a mean Q
conclusionsThe findings of this study demonstrate that app-based uroflowmetry (proudP) measurements serve as an accurate and reliable indicator of perioperative surveillance in patients undergoing TURP for BPH. By enabling personalized and portable uroflowmetry, clinicians can easily monitor treatment response as well as observe the risk of postoperative acute urinary retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.