Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41349018›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Digital Training for Mental Health Promotion in Young People With Climate Change-Related Distress: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Leonie Fleck, Henrik Wasmus, Frederike Schirmbeck, Claudia de Freitas, Raquel Teixeira, Liuska Sanna, Anne Marijn de Graaff, Manuela De Allegri, Hoa Thi Nguyen, Jan R Boehnke and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Leonie FleckDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3970-4887
Henrik WasmusDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-9632-1921
Frederike SchirmbeckDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-0958
Claudia de FreitasCenter for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1828-8642
Raquel TeixeiraEPIUnit - Institute of Public Health (ISPUP), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1942-8317
Liuska SannaMental Health Europe, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0000-0907-1620
Anne Marijn de GraaffDepartment of Mental Health, Brain Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6686-4432
Manuela De AllegriHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8677-1337
Hoa Thi NguyenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9626-2934
Jan R BoehnkeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0249-1870
Evaldas KazlauskasFaculty of Philosophy, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-6654-6220
Wietse TolDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2216-0526
Ulrich ReininghausDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9227-5436

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfforts in mental health research have long focused on the care and long-term outcomes of mental disorders. More recently, a shift in focus has occurred toward mental health promotion and prevention. One priority target population for promotion and prevention is youth with climate change-related distress. In light of the real-world threat of climate change, adaptive emotion regulation and engagement in meaningful action are 2 important strategies for promoting mental health. Ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) allow for the delivery of accessible interventions for young people with climate change-related distress, but evidence on their feasibility or beneficial effects is currently lacking.

objectiveWe aimed to examine the feasibility and initial signals of efficacy of the Climate Mind and Act (CliMACT) training, a novel hybrid EMI for mental health promotion in youth with climate change-related distress.

methodsA 2-arm, parallel-group, and assessor- and analyst-blinded feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in 50 young people aged 14-25 years with climate change-related distress, who will be allocated on a 1:1 ratio to the experimental condition (CliMACT training + care as usual [CAU]) or the control condition (CAU only). CliMACT involves 3 sessions with a mental health professional and 6-week access to a smartphone-based EMI to support the real-world transfer of training content based on compassion-focused interventions and acceptance and commitment therapy. The EMI delivery schemes involve enhancing (introducing new EMI components), consolidating (training of EMI components), and adaptive (triggered in moments of higher negative affect) components. CAU involves access to all standard health care and social services. Feasibility criteria of the trial methodology include recruitment, randomization, and retention. Feasibility outcomes of delivering the CliMACT training include participant satisfaction, participant adherence, and mental health professionals' fidelity to the training protocol. Initial signals of efficacy on mental health candidate outcomes and mechanisms will be explored. As feasibility criteria for a priori planned subgroup analyses, credibility criteria will be established and distributions of indicators for health inequities explored. Feasibility criteria for measuring costs of care and service use and health-related quality of life for an economic evaluation in a future definitive RCT will include exploring response distributions across groups. Candidate outcomes and mechanisms will be assessed at baseline, post training, and 4-week follow-up, using self-report and 6 days of ecological momentary assessment.

resultsThe first enrollment took place in December 2024. Data collection was completed by August 25, 2025. Results are expected for publication in 2026.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study to establish the feasibility and initial signals of efficacy of an EMI, targeted specifically at young people with climate change-related distress. If feasibility can be established, the trial will inform a future fully powered efficacy-effectiveness RCT, accompanied by an economic evaluation.

trial registrationISRCTN ISRCTN33613914; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN33613914. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/77764.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeHealth PromotionMental HealthStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultEcological Momentary AssessmentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychological DistressRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung Adultclimate changeclimate change distressecological momentary assessmentecological momentary interventionfeasibilitymental health promotionmHealthmobile phonerandomized controlled trialyouth

Identifiers

PMID41349018
PMCPMC12717510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.