Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41349008›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025

Moderators of a mHealth Intervention for Adolescent Physical Activity: Intervention Refinement Study.

Christopher C Cushing, Adrian Ortega, David A Fedele, Calissa J Leslie-Miller, Jordan A Carlson, Ann M Davis, Joshua M Smyth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher C CushingDepartment of Clinical Child Psychology and Life Span Institute, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS, 66045, United States, 1 7858640713.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8452-8096
Adrian OrtegaDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Health and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyle & Nutrition, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1003-2156
David A FedeleNemours Children's Health, Jacksonville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0896-910X
Calissa J Leslie-MillerDepartment of Clinical Child Psychology and Life Span Institute, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS, 66045, United States, 1 7858640713.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2523-3911
Jordan A CarlsonCenter for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6008-7983
Ann M DavisDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4859-5894
Joshua M SmythDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0904-5390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An adaptive text messaging intervention to promote adolescent physical activity has demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in a recent proof-of-concept study. To inform future intervention development, a secondary analysis of the data examined how physical activity is influenced by mood, environment, and physical feelings of energy and fatigue. Objective: This study aims to understand how both macro- and microtemporal variables (eg, psychological and environmental variables at both levels) influence the efficacy of a brief mobile health intervention (ie, NUDGE) for physical activity. Methods: Using a matched control design, we evaluated the effect of daily positive and negative affect, perceptions of the weather, energy, and fatigue as moderators of the effect of the intervention on 21 intervention participants and 21 matched controls. Results: Consistent with study hypotheses, macrotemporal (levels of the variable on a 3-week timescale) moderators of intervention effectiveness were observed for positive affect (P<.001), negative affect (P=.03), energy (P<.001), fatigue (P<.001), and perceived weather barriers (P<.001) for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. These effects were observed more consistently for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity than for sedentary behavior, which was only significant for energy (P<.001). No effects for microtemporal variables (at the day level) were observed. Conclusions: There appears to be an optimization opportunity for mobile health physical activity interventions that can be achieved by personalizing intervention features and content based on approximately monthly assessments of affect, physical feeling states, and perceived weather barriers.

Indexed as

acceptabilityadaptive interventionadolescentadolescent well-beingenergyexercisefatiguefeasibilitymHealthmobile healthmoodnudgeoptimizationpersonalizedphysical activityteenteenagertext messagetext messagingyouth

Identifiers

PMID41349008
PMCPMC12680371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.