ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2025
Hidden diversity: Transcriptomic and photosynthetic variation among common 'wild type' Chlamydomonas strains.
Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is a widely studied reference organism, particularly in photosynthesis research. It employs photoprotective mechanisms, such as state transitions (ST) and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), to cope with rapid light changes. Most widely used strains share a recent common ancestor yet differ by up to ~50 000 nuclear variants-genetic diversity that is often overlooked. Even among 'wild type' strains, we document significant phenotypic differences, such as pigment accumulation, and nutrient utilization. To elucidate the basis for this variation, we compared transcriptomes and physiological traits of seven commonly used laboratory strains, including the reference strain and the CLiP mutant library parental strain. Despite identical growth conditions, ~40% of genes were differentially expressed between strains. Most of these differences are attributable to changes that have accrued during laboratory propagation, and adverse conditions may have driven transcriptomic drift. At the physiological level, we catalog the range of strain-dependent responses related to photosynthesis and high light (HL) acclimation. Specifically, (i) all strains develop NPQ upon HL exposure, but to various degrees, (ii) they show a substantial variation in ST capacity, and (iii) they regulate the composition of the photosynthetic apparatus differently. We find that NPQ levels do not correlate with LHCSR3 expression, suggesting an additional layer of NPQ regulation. STs are constantly activated and independent of growth light intensities. Overall, our findings highlight significant strain-to-strain differences in virtually all photosynthetic parameters, emphasizing the importance of careful strain selection in future research endeavors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.