ArticlePloS one2025
Wealth-based equity in essential newborn care practices in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organization has listed several newborn care practices as essential for health and survival. Reports from low-income countries, including Ethiopia, have shown inequities in these practices, but their link to place of birth remains insufficiently explored. We aimed to analyze the wealth-based equity of selected essential newborn care practices, i.e., skin-to-skin care, delayed bathing, proper cord care, and timely breastfeeding initiation, among neonates born in health facilities and homes in Ethiopia.
methodsThe Performance Monitoring for Action Ethiopia 2019-2020 survey was conducted in five regions, representing 90% of the country's population, and included data on 2,493 newborns. Household wealth quintiles were derived using principal component analysis of asset ownership. We analyzed the wealth-based equity of selected essential newborn care practices for facility and home deliveries using equiplot, equity gaps, equity ratios, and concentration indices.
resultsOverall, skin-to-skin care and delayed bathing showed minimal inequities among babies born in health facilities. When comparing the extreme wealth groups, minor socio-economic differences were observed in delayed bathing and timely breastfeeding initiation. When wealth was treated as a continuous variable across all respondents, delayed bathing and proper cord care were more common in better-off households. For home births, the equiplots showed that all selected essential newborn care practices were more frequent among the least poor groups. While comparing the extreme wealth groups, socio-economic inequities were evident in skin-to-skin care and delayed bathing practices. When wealth was considered a continuous variable, skin-to-skin care and delayed bathing were more common among better-off households.
conclusionThe coverage of selected essential newborn care practices was higher in facility deliveries. There were minimal socio-economic differences in newborn care for facility births, while inequities in skin-to-skin care and delayed bathing were prominent in home births. Initiatives should aim to enhance equity in newborn care within health facilities while promoting facility deliveries and improving newborn care practices at home to achieve equitable newborn care in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.