ArticlePloS one2025
Applying a new mold temperature control strategy to improve the tensile strength of thin wall products in injection molding processes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mold temperature control critically influences injection molding, impacting product quality and production efficiency. High mold temperatures enhance surface quality but prolong cooling, increasing cycle time, whereas low temperatures cause defects like weak weld lines and incomplete filling. This study aims to reduce cycle time and enhance tensile strength of thin-wall injection-molded products by developing an innovative mold temperature control strategy using induction heating to preheat mold inserts. The primary objective is to eliminate in-cycle heating delays while ensuring optimal mold temperatures for improved mechanical properties. However, the power consumption of this process significantly increases due to the energy-intensive nature of induction heating. Research involved numerical simulations and experimental validation. COMSOL Multiphysics analyzed thermal and electromagnetic interactions, modeling temperature distributions for heating distances (G = 5, 10, 15 mm) and times (1-8 s). Moldex3D simulated polymer flow behavior, assessing filling capabilities for materials (PC, ABS, PA6, PP). Experiments employed the external induction heating with rotational structure for mold temperature control system (Ex-IHRS), featuring a rotational mechanism to swap preheated inserts, with real-time temperature measurements via sensors and infrared cameras at points S1, S2, and S3. Tensile strength tests evaluated mechanical performance. Rapid heating within 5-8 s maintained stable mold temperatures without extending cycle time, outperforming traditional methods like resistance or steam heating. Significant tensile strength improvements occurred, with PC increasing from 111.9 MPa to 123 MPa after 6 s of heating, ABS reaching 91.3 MPa after 4 s, PA6 rising from 55.4 MPa to 62.8 MPa, and PP improving from 41.3 MPa to 47.3 MPa. Enhanced weld line integrity and reduced frozen layers drove these gains, minimizing defects in thin-wall components. Simulations showed less than 5% deviation from experimental data, validating the approach's accuracy. Despite higher power consumption, this induction heating strategy optimizes production efficiency and enhances product quality, offering a promising advancement for thin-wall and microinjection molding applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.