Observational studyPloS one2025
The sociomotor role and its meaning in traditional sporting games: Socio-affective rejection in question.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study analyses the sociomotor dynamics of the traditional sporting game (TSG) Bear, Guardian and Hunters from the perspective of motor praxeology, exploring how players adjust their strategies according to the internal logic of the game and their socio-affective status.
methodThis is an observational study involving 10 university students, recording a total of 1,810 observational sequences during the game's development. Variables such as type of striking and distance from the Bear were assessed, along with sociometric indices of rejection and their influence on motor decisions.
resultsThe phases of the game condition players' behaviour. In the initial phase, motor aggressiveness predominates; in the intermediate phase, a defensive strategy is adopted; and in the final phase, extreme prudence prevails. Players with higher levels of social rejection exhibit more aggressive behaviour, and the Hunters tend to distance themselves more from the Bear when the latter is marginalised.
conclusionThis TSG provides a valuable educational setting for developing socio-affective relationships, managing motor aggressiveness, and fostering interpersonal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.