ArticlePloS one2025
Optimizing solar irradiance forecasting: ANN models enhanced with ADAM and Cuckoo search algorithm.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renewable energy sources (RES) are being used and integrated into the electrical grid as a result of the environment's effects and the ever-increasing demand for energy. Reliable and accurate forecasts are necessary to address environmental concerns and improve grid management due to the intermittent availability of renewable energy sources. This study focuses on improving ANN-based techniques for precise solar irradiance prediction as the prediction accuracy of an artificial neural network (ANN) is impacted by the random assignment of weights to its edges. As a result, we proposed hybrid solar irradiance forecasting models in which the cuckoo search algorithm (CSA) and adaptive moment estimation (ADAM) are used to optimize the weights assigned to the ANN's edges. Two models were presented in this study namely: ADAM-optimized ANN model and a novel two-stage optimization technique known as CSA-ADAM optimized ANN model for accurate and reliable forecasting of solar irradiance. Both models were tested using actual weather data, and standard error metrics like mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) to assess their accuracy. The outcomes demonstrate that ADAM-optimized ANN model produced MSE = 0.52, MAPE = 0.18%, MAE = 0.64, and RMSE = 0.72, and CSA-ADAM optimized ANN model obtained MSE = 0.25, MAPE = 0.17%, MAE = 0.43, and RMSE = 0.50. We evaluated the practicality of both models by comparing their average prediction times using the same test dataset. While the ADAM-optimized ANN model took an average of 0.1093 ± 0.0085 seconds to make predictions on the test data, the CSA-ADAM optimized ANN model took 0.1110 ± 0.0058 seconds. These findings demonstrate that using CSA to optimize the ANN weights increases the accuracy of solar irradiance predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.