ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Mixed method program impact evaluation: Reducing economic barriers to accessing health services (REBAHS) long-term primary healthcare subsidization protocol (LPSP) II action in Lebanon.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The REBAHS LPSP II action launched in May 2022 by International Medical Corps (IMC) and Première Urgence Internationale (PUI) in Lebanon is a continuation of previous initiatives implemented in Primary Healthcare Centers (PHCCs) with the key aim to support service provision in PHCCs. This study aims to present a multi-faceted impact evaluation approach, quantifying the outcomes of the action and identifying areas for improvement. A mixed-method approach was adopted, including quantitative and qualitative tools to assess the impact of the initiative's health sector. Indicators of PHCC service utilization were extracted from the National Health Information System (PHENICS) and analyzed through descriptive analysis, interrupted time series analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Key-informant interviews (KII) were conducted with donors and stakeholders, and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were implemented with PHCC staff members to gain a deeper understanding of the impact, challenges, and areas for improvement of the initiative. The action resulted in an overall increase in the proportion of children being screened for malnutrition, women being screened for breast cancer via mammogram testing, and a high number of antenatal care visits. Improved access to care, patient satisfaction, quality of care, and disease detection and management among other positive impacts have been highlighted. Barriers to implementation including administrative burdens, staff turnover, and financial constraints among others have been suggested. Lessons learned and recommendations for future program design have been highlighted. This study may serve as a model for enhancing healthcare systems globally by enhancing global funding models, optimizing resource allocation, and improving program impact, specifically in conflict-affected settings and countries with limited resources, thereby enhancing healthcare access, health service delivery, and program sustainability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.