Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348826›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Neural correlates and reinstatement of recent and remote memory in children and young adults.

Iryna Schommartz, Philip F Lembcke, Javier Ortiz-Tudela, Martin Bauer, Angela M Kaindl, Claudia Buss, Yee Lee Shing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iryna SchommartzDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8655-9259
Philip F LembckeCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Psychology, Berlin, Germany.
Javier Ortiz-TudelaDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Martin BauerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Psychology, Berlin, Germany.
Angela M KaindlCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9454-206X
Claudia Buss *Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Psychology, Berlin, Germany.
Yee Lee Shing *Department of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 327654276Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 1315European Research Council 758898Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst TAM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory consolidation tends to be less robust in childhood than adulthood. However, little is known about the corresponding functional differences in the developing brain that may underlie age-related differences in retention of memories over time. This study examined system-level memory consolidation of object-scene associations after learning (immediate delay), one night of sleep (short delay), as well as 2 weeks (long delay) in 5- to 7-year-old children (n=49) and in young adults (n=39), as a reference group with mature consolidation systems. Particularly, we characterized how functional neural activation and reinstatement of neural patterns change over time, assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging combined with representational similarity analysis (RSA). Our results showed that memory consolidation in children was less robust and strong (i.e. more forgetting) compared to young adults. Contrasting correctly retained remote vs. recent memories across time delay, children showed less upregulation in posterior parahippocampal gyrus, lateral occipital cortex, and cerebellum than adults. In addition, both children and adults showed a decrease in scene-specific neural reinstatement over time, indicating time-related decay of detailed differentiated memories. At the same time, we observed the emergence of generic gist-like neural representations in prefrontal brain regions uniquely in children, indicating qualitative difference in memory trace in children. Taken together, 5- to 7-year-old children, compared to young adults, show less robust memory consolidation, possibly due to difficulties in engaging in differentiated neural representations in neocortical mnemonic regions during retrieval of remote memories, coupled with relying more on gist-like generic neural representations.

Indexed as

BrainMemory ConsolidationMemory, Long-TermAdultBrain MappingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adulthumanmemory consolidationneural reinstatementneuroscienceobject-scene associationsrepresentational similarity analysis

Identifiers

PMID41348826
PMCPMC12680376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.