Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348821›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Structural robustness of networks with degree-degree correlations between second-nearest neighbors.

Yuka Fujiki, Stefan Junk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuka FujikiFrontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences (FRIS), Tohoku University, 6-3 Aramaki aza Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3673-5589
Stefan JunkGakushuin University, 1-5-1 Mejiro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We numerically investigate the robustness of networks with degree-degree correlations between nodes separated by distance l = 2 in terms of shortest path length. The degree-degree correlation between the l-th nearest neighbors can be quantified by Pearson's correlation coefficient rl for the degrees of two nodes at distance l. We introduce l-th nearest-neighbor correlated random networks (l-NNCRNs) that are degree-degree correlated at less than or equal to the l-th nearest neighbor scale and maximally random at farther scales. We generate 2-NNCRNs with various r1 and r2 using two steps of random edge rewiring based on the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm and compare their robustness against failures of nodes and edges. As typical cases of homogeneous and heterogeneous degree distributions, we adopted Poisson and power law distributions. Our results show that the range of r2 differs depending on the degree distribution and the value of r1. Moreover, comparing 2-NNCRNs sharing the same degree distribution and r1, we demonstrate that a higher r2 makes a network more robust against random node/edge failures as well as degree-based targeted attacks. This behavior was observed in nearly all simulated cases, except for highly assortative power-law networks, where the relationship is more complex.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAlgorithmsComputer Simulation

Identifiers

PMID41348821
PMCPMC12680194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.