ArticlePloS one2025
Structural robustness of networks with degree-degree correlations between second-nearest neighbors.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We numerically investigate the robustness of networks with degree-degree correlations between nodes separated by distance l = 2 in terms of shortest path length. The degree-degree correlation between the l-th nearest neighbors can be quantified by Pearson's correlation coefficient rl for the degrees of two nodes at distance l. We introduce l-th nearest-neighbor correlated random networks (l-NNCRNs) that are degree-degree correlated at less than or equal to the l-th nearest neighbor scale and maximally random at farther scales. We generate 2-NNCRNs with various r1 and r2 using two steps of random edge rewiring based on the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm and compare their robustness against failures of nodes and edges. As typical cases of homogeneous and heterogeneous degree distributions, we adopted Poisson and power law distributions. Our results show that the range of r2 differs depending on the degree distribution and the value of r1. Moreover, comparing 2-NNCRNs sharing the same degree distribution and r1, we demonstrate that a higher r2 makes a network more robust against random node/edge failures as well as degree-based targeted attacks. This behavior was observed in nearly all simulated cases, except for highly assortative power-law networks, where the relationship is more complex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.