ArticlePloS one2025
Impact of training and digital extension services on agricultural technology adoption and rice yields.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although rice is the primary staple crop in Nepal, its yields have not increased sufficiently to keep pace with population growth and food security needs. The key factors contributing to this challenge is inadequate agricultural extension services that meets farmers' demand and the low adoption rate of technologies that could enhance rice productivity. This study evaluates the effects of sequential agricultural training and real-time digital extension services on the technology adoption and rice yield in Nepal's Western Terai, where evidence on the effectiveness of such combined intervention remains limited. Using data from a stratified random sample of 1,396 households, including treatment, control-in, and control-out groups, we assess the impact of these interventions on technology adoption and rice yield. We apply quasi-experimental methods including treatment effects model (IPWRA), seemingly unrelated regression, and instrumental variable approaches. Our findings consistently indicate that smallholder farmers who receive agricultural training combined with digital extension services have 11.4-15.7 percentage points higher adoption rate of split urea application in three doses at the recommended stages of plant growth, resulting in a 35-56% increase in rice yield compared to the reference group. These results suggest that the combined effect of agricultural training and digital extension services significantly outperforms agricultural training alone in both technology adoption and yield improvement, which is one of the key contributions of this study. The findings highlight the potential of bundled approach to enhance rice productivity and strengthen food security. However, limited Internet access in farming communities and difficulties in interpreting digital advisories may constrain the broader adoption of these agricultural practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.