ArticlePloS one2025
Development of an open-hardware semen homogenizer and application to serotonin effects on sperm motility.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proper homogenization of semen samples is crucial for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and analysis of sperm motility kinematics in experimental research. Accurate homogenization ensures a consistent number of sperm per insemination in ART and uniforms number of sperm per treatment in research. Homogenization is particularly important when sperm are treated with exogenous compounds that must be evenly distributed throughout the experiment. Traditionally, semen samples are homogenized manually with a "gentle" approach or with commercial devices that are not specifically designed for this purpose. In this study, we designed, constructed, and validated an open-hardware semen homogenizer for sperm motility analysis. For validity, the hardware was used to investigate the effects of serotonin (5-HT) on boar sperm kinematics at the subpopulation level using a computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA). All components of the homogenizer are readily available, including the STL files for the 3D-printed parts, firmware, assembly instructions, and operation guidelines. Objective homogenization was evaluated by measuring sperm density at different numbers of homogenization cycle, while "gentle" homogenization was assessed based on manual duration and inclination angle. Sperm motility kinematics showed no changes at the average level, however distinct effects emerged within subpopulations. Exposure to 5-HT differentially affected sperm motility kinematics across subpopulations displaying no change, increase or decrease in velocity indices. Under over-homogenization conditions, a clear interaction between prolonged homogenization and 5-HT exposure was observed in all subpopulations. Results suggest that objective homogenization is essential to ensure consistent sperm density, whereas over-homogenization alters sperm responses, potentially leading to biological misinterpretations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.