ArticlePloS one2025
Sense-checking the approach to quantitative sensory testing to detect chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Utility of Vibration Perception Thresholds as a Biomarker of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond symptoms: wearable digital biomarkers for subclinical detection of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) have abnormalities in Quantitative Sensory Test (QST) findings. However, the predictive utility of QST for the early detection of CIPN in individuals has not been demonstrated. This will require longitudinal QST during chemotherapy treatments. However, QST is time-consuming, requires expertise and complex, costly equipment which has largely prevented its adoption in routine clinical practice. We aimed to assess approaches to develop a reliable, straightforward, time efficient and sensitive sensory testing method. Guided by patient partner input and previous literature, we selected thermal and vibration detection thresholds as target QST parameters. A series of iterative experiments was conducted to determine the optimal body test site and to develop a novel vibration testing protocol. The thenar eminence emerged as the best candidate due to higher sensitivity to all stimulus modalities, lower variance and less age-related change compared to the feet. We demonstrated significant differences in thermal thresholds between healthy participants and people with CIPN measured at the thenar but not the feet. The vibration testing protocol, employing a linear resonant actuator, performed better than a calibrated tuning fork being sufficiently sensitive to identify age-related and body site differences in sensory function well as tracking sensory loss induced by local anaesthetic nerve block. These findings establish a testing framework to deliver QST at a single convenient body site with a reduced set of modalities to efficiently track multifibre sensory function for patients at risk of developing neuropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.