ArticlePloS one2025
Nominal elastic modulus assessment in 3D-printed components under varying printing parameters using Bayesian methods and random forest surrogate modeling.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expanding range of materials available for 3D printing is driving its widespread adoption in advanced fields. As 3D printing becomes increasingly prevalent in the manufacturing of industrial components, its advantages in accommodating complex geometries and reducing material waste are attracting significant attention. Acquiring and applying precise elastic properties of materials during structural design is crucial for ensuring part safety and consistency. However, non-destructive mechanical property assessment methods remain limited. In this paper, we propose an efficient surrogate model, built using a Bayesian model updating approach combined with a random forest algorithm, to achieve high-precision calibration of material elastic constants. In the experiment, samples were 3D printed using fused deposition modeling, and modal information was obtained using operational modal analysis with one end fixed to simulate cantilever beam boundary conditions. Parameter updating was then performed within a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo framework. The deviation between the updated calculated frequencies and the measured frequencies was significantly reduced, and the Modal Assurance Criterion value between the updated calculated mode shapes and the measured mode shapes was higher than 0.99, demonstrating the accuracy of the updated parameters. Compared to traditional destructive testing methods, the proposed method directly calibrates the structural elastic modulus at the component level without affecting the normal use of the component, providing a more practical approach for the analysis and research of material properties in 3D printing additive manufacturing. The related technology can be extended to other structural forms of 3D-printed products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.