Trial reportPloS one2025
Lime-based supplement reduces calcium oxalate stone recurrence: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective effects of Rhus coriaria L. fruit extract against experimental calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis via modulation of oxidative stress and renal injury.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- The Application of Nanomaterials in Kidney Stone Disease: Emerging Strategies for Early Diagnosis, Targeted Therapy, and Prevention.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent urolithiasis is a major clinical challenge, with more than 50% of patients experiencing recurrence within 5 years. While potassium citrate effectively reduces recurrence, poor adherence due to cost and gastrointestinal side effects limits its long-term use. Citrus-based interventions, such as lime juice, have shown potential in enhancing urinary citrate and alkalinity but require further validation. This study evaluated the efficacy of a lime-based phytochemical-rich regimen (LPR) in preventing stone recurrence and reducing urinary inflammation in post-operative urolithiasis patients.
objectiveThis multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel lime-based preparation called LPR in preventing kidney stone recurrence over 24 months.
methodsIn a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, 173 patients with calcium oxalate urolithiasis who had undergone successful stone removal were enrolled from six hospitals in Thailand. Participants were randomized to receive either LPR or placebo for 24 months. The primary outcome was the incidence of stone recurrence confirmed by computerized topography (CT). Secondary outcomes included changes in urinary protein excretion and urinary interleukin-8 (IL-8) level, a pro-inflammatory cytokine implicated in renal inflammation and stone formation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression were used to assess recurrence risk.
resultsOf 173 enrolled participants, 151 completed the study. The recurrence rate at 2 years was significantly lower in the LPR group (14%) compared to placebo (45%) (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.13-0.44; log-rank p < 0.0001) favoring LPR. Among completers, LPR significantly reduced urinary IL-8 level (p = 0.017) and 24-hour urinary protein excretion (p = 0.032) compared to baseline and placebo. No serious adverse events were reported, and adherence was high in both groups.
conclusionLPR, a lime-based supplement rich in citrate and flavonoids, significantly reduced the 2-year recurrence rate of calcium oxalate stones by approximately 76%. This effect may be mediated by increased urinary citrate excretion, alkalinization, and attenuation of renal inflammation, as evidenced by reduced urinary IL-8 and proteinuria. LPR was well tolerated, with minimal adverse effects, and may serve as a safe, cost-effective adjunct for secondary prevention in patients intolerant to conventional alkali therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.