Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348605›Full record

SynthesisDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2025

A systematic review of therapeutic options for lymphocytic esophagitis.

Bachviet Nguyen, Chun Fang Cheng, Fahd Jowhari

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Lymphocytic Esophagitis: Convergent Symptoms, Divergent Biology.Recent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bachviet NguyenDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 13750, 96 Ave. Critical Care Tower, 3rd Floor, Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9177-7039
Chun Fang ChengDepartment of Statistics, University of British Columbia, 3182 Earth Sciences Building, 2207 Main Mall, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Fahd JowhariDivision of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 564 Leon Avenue, Kelowna, V1Y 6J6, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-7875-1790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymphocytic esophagitis (LyE) is a novel rare esophageal disorder characterized by intraepithelial lymphocytic infiltration of the esophagus in a peripapillary distribution, without the involvement of granulocytes. The optimal treatment strategy for this condition remains uncertain. We aimed to synthesize the current evidence for the treatment of lymphocytic esophagitis.

methodsWe performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines, searching MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. Studies with non-primary data or insufficient treatment data were excluded. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient demographics and treatment outcomes.

resultsThirty nine articles from 2012-2024 were included (154 patients total). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were the most common initial therapy for LyE (n = 65), followed by topical steroids (n = 23). A greater proportion of patients experienced a symptomatic, endoscopic, and histologic response from the initial use of topical steroids as monotherapy or part of combination therapy (with PPIs) compared to PPIs alone. Symptomatic recurrence was more common after initial use of topical steroids compared to PPIs. Balloon dilation was effective in relieving symptomatic esophageal dysphagia. Other therapies included biologics, endoscopic botulinum injections, sucralfate, and tacrolimus. The average follow-up duration was 8.98 months.

conclusionsFor patients with LyE, topical steroids seem to provide greater symptomatic and histologic benefit compared to PPIs, although recurrence is more common. For patients not already on acid suppression therapy, PPIs may still be a reasonable first-line option, especially when prioritizing safety. Further prospective studies are needed to formally assess the comparative safety and efficacy of the various treatment modalities, including novel immunosuppressive therapies.

Indexed as

EsophagitisProton Pump InhibitorsAdultAgedDeglutition DisordersDilatationFemaleHumansLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceSteroidsTacrolimusTreatment OutcomeProton Pump InhibitorsSteroidsTacrolimusbiologicsbudesonidediseases of the esophagusesophagitislymphocytic esophagitisproton pump inhibitors (PPIs)tacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID41348605
PMCPMC12680012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.