SynthesisBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Causal network analysis of omics data using prior knowledge databases.
Synthesis in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell sequencing and machine learning-based prediction of spliceosome-associated factor 2 may represent potential targets for osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
- Multimodal bioinformatic analyses of genome-scale expression beyond gene-centric differential expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- From empirical vaccinology to predictive systems-based vaccine design: multi-omics integration, artificial intelligence, and global equity challenges.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying causal relationships in omics data is essential for understanding underlying biological processes. However, detecting these relationships remains challenging due to the complexity of molecular networks and observational data limitations. To guide researchers, we conducted a systematic literature review of data-driven causal omics analysis methods that use structured prior knowledge from regulatory and interaction databases. We grouped methods into three approaches based on the extent of prior knowledge integration: regulon-level (direct regulator-target links, straightforward interpretation, but with the risk of oversimplification), flow-level (multi-step propagation from regulators to targets, broader mechanism explanation, but lacking uncertainty modeling), and network-level (system-wide interactions and crosstalk, most comprehensive, but with increased computational complexity and requiring particularly careful interpretation). These methods have demonstrated utility across diverse applications, including identification of therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia, elucidation of mechanisms in IgA nephropathy, and detection of regulatory perturbations in Alzheimer's disease. We discuss the strengths, limitations, and representative use cases of each approach, and address general limitations and outline future research directions. This review serves as a practical guide for the entire analysis process, from selecting prior knowledge databases (PKDBs) to choosing and applying causal analysis methods for different research questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.