ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025
In silico approaches for discovering microbial antiviral defense systems.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prokaryotes possess a remarkably diverse and dynamic repertoire of antiviral defense systems, enabling them to withstand phage predation. However, their frequent horizontal gene transfer, extensive sequence diversity, modular genomic organization, and rapid evolution make purely experimental discovery challenging. Coupled with the massive influx of microbial genomes from high-throughput sequencing, computational strategies have become indispensable complementary tools that can enhance the efficiency and scope of defense systems discovery. In this review, we categorize computational approaches into four major strategies: (i) Sequence homology-based methods, which reliably annotate known defense systems through protein sequence similarity but are limited in detecting highly divergent or novel systems; (ii) Structure-guided approaches, which leverage conserved protein folds to uncover remote homologs and single-gene defense proteins, providing sensitivity beyond sequence-based identification, albeit at high computational cost; (iii) Genomic context-based strategies, which exploit gene co-localization and defense islands to uncover multi-gene defense clusters and previously uncharacterized defense modules; and (iv) Artificial intelligence-powered methods, which integrate sequence-derived embeddings with genomic context information to predict low-homology proteins and reconstruct candidate defense systems at scale, enabling discovery of novel systems beyond the reach of conventional approaches. We further discuss emerging tools and frameworks, such as the conserved gene cluster discovery tool and genomic foundation models, which hold strong potential to extend conventional approaches for identifying novel defense systems and supporting the generative design of synthetic modules. By comparing methodological principles, strengths, and limitations, this review provides a practical framework for the systematic exploration of microbial immune systems, guiding applications such as rational phage therapy, microbiome engineering, and synthetic biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.