ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Experiences of women facing intimate partner violence during the revocation of protective orders.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo interpret the lived experiences of women in situation of violence who request the revocation of emergency protective orders.
methodStrauss and Corbin's Grounded Theory (GT) and Symbolic Interactionism were used at the Women's Police Station in a town in the State of São Paulo, through interviews with 28 participants from two sample groups: women experiencing violence and police station professionals.
resultsThe results were organized into categories related to the components of the theoretical model, "Experiencing the Request to revoke an Emergency Protective Order," highlighting the emotional and contextual challenges faced by women seeking formal help. These challenges are permeated by ambivalent feelings, experiences of revictimization, and different coping strategies to reframe their life trajectories. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: The revocation is related to family consequences - guilt, regret, and sadness -, despite acknowledging the violence. The lack of understanding of the judicial system and the emotional bond with the perpetrator demonstrate the need to consider the symbolic meanings of interactions in primary care nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.