Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348536›Full record

SynthesisClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Various Anticoagulation Regimens for Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Zain Ul Abideen, Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Noor Ul Huda Ramzan, Hamna Raheel, Fariha Hasan, Pawan Kumar Thada, Prasun K Jalal

Abstract readComparative StudyNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zain Ul AbideenDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0001-8990-7738
Muhammad Hassan WaseemDepartment of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0002-4521-3256
Noor Ul Huda RamzanDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Hamna RaheelDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fariha HasanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA.
Pawan Kumar ThadaDepartment of Medicine, Sotang Primary Hospital, Solukhumbu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-2085-8739
Prasun K JalalDivision of Abdominal Transplantation of the Michael E. DeBakey, Department of Surgery and Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundPortal venous thrombosis (PVT) is a serious complication in cirrhosis, with management debated due to differing anticoagulant guidelines. This network meta-analysis assessed various anticoagulants for PVT in cirrhotic patients.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Central, and ScienceDirect were searched till May 2025. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted in RStudio version 4.3.3. The ranking was based on P-scores.ResultsNineteen studies were included in the analysis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (RR = 2.38; 95%CI:[1.17, 4.85]; p = 0.02), fondaparinux (RR = 18.16; 95%CI:[2.09, 158.13]; p = 0.009), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (RR = 11.96; 95%CI:[1.58, 90.79]; p = 0.01), LMWH-Warfarin sequential therapy (RR = 2.32; 95%CI:[1.01, 5.31]; p = 0.04), and Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (RR = 1.71; 95%CI:[1.03, 2.83]; p = 0.04) showed a significant increase in complete recanalization, with fondaparinux ranked highest (P-score = 0.94). DOACs (RR = 0.23;95%CI:[0.07, 0.71]; p = 0.01), LMWH (RR = 0.24;95%CI:[0.11, 0.52]; p = 0.0003), LMWH-Warfarin sequential therapy (RR = 0.40;95%CI:[0.21, 0.77]; p = 0.006) demonstrated a significant reduction in PVT progression, with Antithrombin-III ranked highest (P-score = 0.87). Fondaparinux was ranked highest (P-score = 0.90) for reducing esophageal variceal bleeding, while LMWH was ranked highest (P-score = 0.72) for decreasing overall bleeding. DOACs significantly decreased mortality (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: [0.67, 0.81]; p < 0.0001), with LMWH ranked highest (P-score = 0.80) for mortality.ConclusionDOACs, LMWH, and LMWH-Warfarin sequential therapy significantly improved recanalization and reduced PVT progression. LMWH was ranked highest in reducing bleeding and mortality, while fondaparinux ranked highest regarding esophageal bleeding and complete recanalization.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsLiver CirrhosisPortal VeinVenous ThrombosisHumansAnticoagulantsdirect oral anticoagulantsliver cirrhosislow molecular weight heparinnetwork meta-analysisportal venous thrombosisvitamin k antagonist

Identifiers

PMID41348536
PMCPMC12682983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.