ReviewPain and therapy2026
The Therapeutic Potential of Dual NMR (NOP/MOP) Agonism in Pain Management.
Review in Pain and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical Evaluation of Dual NOP/Mu Partial Agonists for Methamphetamine Use Disorder.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structural basis for dual targeting of μ-opioid and nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptors by Cebranopadol.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Addressing pain effectively remains a major global challenge for healthcare systems and public health initiatives. While this issue is pervasive worldwide, it is particularly pressing in the United States, where pain management using opioid analgesics has led to significant concerns due to widespread misuse, drug dependence, and overdose fatalities. A central dilemma for clinicians in pain management lies in balancing the delivery of sufficient pain relief while minimizing potential risks. Although preferential μ-opioid receptor (MOP) agonists, such as morphine and oxycodone, often remain a necessary therapeutic choice, particularly for individuals experiencing moderate to severe pain, their safety profiles present a clinical dilemma, as there are limited other options available to clinicians. A promising area of research focus is on the development of dual NOP/MOP receptor (NMR) agonists , compounds that co-activate the nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) receptor and the MOP receptor. Despite sharing some structural homology with opioid receptors, the NOP receptor exhibits a distinct pharmacological profile. Activating the NOP receptor induces pain relief and, more importantly, counteracts important adverse effects associated with MOP activation including reduction in euphoria by inhibiting opioid-induced activation of dopaminergic neuron activity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), which in turn reduces the likelihood of misuse. Preclinical data have shown a potential role of NOP activation in reducing the occurrence of opioid withdrawal symptoms and, perhaps most importantly, respiratory depression. Investigations in nonhuman primates support the NOP receptor's modulatory role, demonstrating that NOP agonism not only produced analgesia across various pain models (nociceptive, neuropathic, and inflammatory) but also lessened MOP-related negative outcomes, such as opioid reward-seeking behavior, the development of tolerance, and withdrawal symptoms. Preclinical studies using dual NMR agonists showed that administration of a NOP antagonist increased the side effects similar to those caused by a preferential MOP agonist, underscoring the role of NOP receptor activation in counteracting these adverse events. Altogether these findings suggest that dual NMR (NOP/MOP receptor) agonists represent a promising novel class of medications with the potential to achieve strong analgesia while lessening the side effects of opioid agonists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.