ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
Assessing the construct validity of the Farra Eye Model for capsulorhexis training in cataract surgery: a pilot study.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCapsulorhexis is a critical and technically demanding step in cataract surgery where slight errors can cause serious complications, making repeated simulation-based training essential. Limited access to hands-on surgical training has increased reliance on simulators, but existing models are often costly and limited. To address this, the Farra Eye Model was developed as a low-cost, reusable 3D-printed simulator offering realistic eye simulation. This study aims to assess its construct validity in distinguishing between different levels of surgical expertise.
methodsA cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with 33 participants (11 novices, 11 intermediates, and 11 experts) grouped by cataract surgery experience. Each performed three capsulorhexis attempts on the Farra Eye Model, with the second and third attempts recorded. Two blinded consultants independently assessed the masked videos using the capsulorhexis indices in the ICO-OSCAR: Phaco assessment tool, along with forceps grabs and procedure duration. Construct validity was tested using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests, and inter-rater reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), with values > 0.7 considered satisfactory.
resultsIntermediate and expert groups outperformed novices in capsulorhexis, with higher ICO-OSCAR scores, fewer forceps grabs, and shorter procedure durations (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the intermediate and expert groups (p > 0.05). Inter-rater reliability was excellent for all parameters (ICC > 0.7).
conclusionThe Farra Eye Model can distinguish between novice and experienced surgeons (intermediate and expert groups), demonstrating construct validity. However, the inability to distinguish between intermediate and expert performance suggests limited sensitivity to advanced skill levels, highlighting the need for further refinements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41348381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.