ArticleThe FEBS journal2026
MAVS oligomerization drives a faster and more efficient antiviral signaling activation at peroxisomes compared to mitochondria.
Article in The FEBS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic type II interferon promotes tumor growth through mitochondrial RNA-induced type I interferon and prostaglandin synthesis.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Regulation of Innate Immune Signaling by Autophagy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- C-terminal tail of MAVS dictates organelle targeting and innate immune response.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peroxisomes and mitochondria are important platforms for antiviral signal transduction, as detection of cytosolic viral RNA by retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs) induces the activation of the mitochondrial antiviral signaling adaptor (MAVS) at both organelles. To decisively elucidate the mechanistic differences and similarities in kinetics and end products between these two pathways, we developed a doxycycline-inducible system that allows for precise control of MAVS expression and activation at either peroxisomes or mitochondria, in a timely manner, and across various cell types. Our findings demonstrate that both peroxisomal and mitochondrial MAVS induce type I and III interferon-dependent antiviral signaling and that the peroxisomal signaling occurs significantly faster than its mitochondrial counterpart. Importantly, using not only the doxycycline-inducible system but also the conventional activation of the MAVS pathway through direct stimulation of RIG-I-like receptors, we demonstrate that the rapid and robust antiviral response resulting from peroxisomal MAVS activation is mechanistically due to the faster oligomerization of MAVS at the membranes of this organelle, when compared to mitochondria. These data emphasize the versatility and speed of the peroxisome-dependent antiviral response and may lead to the identification of specific targets to develop novel host-directed antiviral strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.