ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Impact of public vs. private insurance coverage on quality of life of women with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality of life (QOL) data for the Brazilian population with breast cancer are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate QOL in Brazilian women with early-stage breast cancer treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and to explore its relationship with patients' clinical and social characteristics and type of healthcare insurance.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study among women with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) invasive carcinoma of the breast in Brazil. Eligible patients who had received locoregional care and had undergone adjuvant ET for more than 6 months were contacted in person during clinic visits. The EORTC QLQ-C30-V3 and QLQ-BR23 scales were used as questionnaires to assess the QOL of patients.
resultsFrom June 2021 to March 2024, 774 women with ER + early-stage breast cancer from 14 Brazilian institutions were contacted. A total of 347 women (44.8%) were treated at private institutions. The mean age was 56.5 years (SD 11.9). The median duration of ET use was 3.2 years (SD, 2.1). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that treatment at a public institution was a significant predictor of higher nausea and vomiting scores (p = 0.042), pain (p = 0.0008), financial difficulty (p < 0.0001), arm symptoms (p < 0.0001), and breast symptoms (p < 0.0001).
conclusionIn this cohort, patients treated at public institutions had lower QOL. Younger age (< 60 years), presence of comorbidities, and ovarian suppression associated with ET were key predictors of poor QOL. These findings provide insights for guiding the development of tailored interventions for the Brazilian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.