GuidelineEuropean radiology2026
ESR Essentials: renal imaging in children-practice recommendations by the European Society of Paediatric Radiology.
Guideline in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pediatric magnetic resonance urography from patient preparation to post-processing: basics and controversies.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal pathology is common in childhood. Imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis of kidney diseases and encompasses a range of modalities. Advanced imaging is typically performed in specialised paediatric hospitals, where experienced paediatric radiologists are familiar with the relevant techniques, protocols, indications, and limitations. However, children are often first admitted to general hospitals, where radiologists may have more limited experience in paediatric imaging. Renal cysts in children differ from those in adults, most commonly presenting as cystic kidney diseases. In the majority of cases, ultrasound (US) is the sole diagnostic modality required. Imaging is not necessary for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI), but it is essential for detecting underlying anomalies and potential complications. Urinary tract dilatation is a common finding in children; however, only up to 30% of cases require further evaluation to diagnose urinary tract obstruction or vesicourinary reflux. Urolithiasis is relatively uncommon in children and is primarily diagnosed with US, although computed tomography (CT) may occasionally be necessary. Solid renal lesions identified on US should be further evaluated in highly specialised paediatric centres. Mild to moderate renal trauma can be diagnosed and monitored using US, whereas CT remains the modality of choice for assessing severe trauma. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review provides general radiologists with a comprehensive overview of the normal renal appearance across paediatric age groups, including normal variants and imaging pathways for the most common renal pathologies in children. It also highlights scenarios where referral to specialised paediatric centres is necessary. KEY POINTS: US is the first-line imaging modality for diagnosing most renal pathologies in children. MRI is used in a variety of situations (e.g. complex congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, or focal lesions) when US is not sufficient. CT is reserved for emergencies and in selected cases of urolithiasis. Knowledge of normal renal features, including normal anatomical and morphological variants across different age groups, is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.